SWEENEY GIVES GOVT 14 DAYS EXTRA (INSTEAD OF 21)...SAYS RESPOND BY AUGUST 10TH.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
No. 13-465C
(Filed: July 15, 2015)
*************************************
FAIRHOLME FUNDS, INC., et al., *
*
Plaintiffs, *
*
v. *
*
THE UNITED STATES, *
*
Defendant. *
*************************************
ORDER
The New York Times Company has filed a motion to intervene and for the de-designation of jurisdictional discovery materials in the above-captioned case. Defendant has filed a motion for an extension of time to, and including, August 17, 2015, to respond. The New York Times opposes any extension beyond July 27, 2015. The court has reviewed defendant’s motion for an extension of time and concludes that defendant’s request is reasonable, but not the amount of time requested. Consequently, the court GRANTS IN PART defendant’s motion; its response shall be filed by no later than Monday, August 10, 2015.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Margaret M. Sweeney
MARGARET M. SWEENEY
Judge
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 209 Filed 07/15/15 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 208 Filed 07/15/15 Page 1 of 1
ORDER
Plaintiffs in the above-captioned case have filed several motions to remove the “protected information” designation from certain deposition transcripts and documents produced during jurisdictional discovery. The court has now received motions from defendant, Grant Thornton LLP, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, the Federal National Mortgage Association, PricewaterhouseCoopers, and Deloitte & Touche LLP. These motions request an extension of time to, and including, August 17, 2015, to file their respective responses to plaintiffs’ motions. Plaintiffs oppose extensions to file responses beyond July 27, 2015. The court has reviewed the pending motions for extensions of time and concludes that the bases articulated for the requests are reasonable, but not the amount of time requested. Consequently, the court GRANTS IN PART these motions; the responses shall be filed by no later than Monday, August 10, 2015.
In addition, the court VACATES its July 8, 2015 order setting a status conference for August 13, 2015. Within seven days of the reply memoranda being filed with respect to these motions, the parties shall confer and contact chambers to propose convenient dates for a status conference.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
ORDER
Plaintiffs in the above-captioned case have filed several motions to remove the “protected information” designation from certain deposition transcripts and documents produced during jurisdictional discovery. The court has now received motions from defendant, Grant Thornton LLP, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, the Federal National Mortgage Association, PricewaterhouseCoopers, and Deloitte & Touche LLP. These motions request an extension of time to, and including, August 17, 2015, to file their respective responses to plaintiffs’ motions. Plaintiffs oppose extensions to file responses beyond July 27, 2015. The court has reviewed the pending motions for extensions of time and concludes that the bases articulated for the requests are reasonable, but not the amount of time requested. Consequently, the court GRANTS IN PART these motions; the responses shall be filed by no later than Monday, August 10, 2015.
AI
