InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 248
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/30/2015

Re: None

Monday, 07/13/2015 9:11:15 AM

Monday, July 13, 2015 9:11:15 AM

Post# of 4188
Time to summarize what I said.

1. I believe that Breitling has exaggerated it's technical involvement in wells. There is evidence to support this opinion and evidence to the contrary is under the control of Breitling and not public. I have not said that CF is a scam artist and I have not said he has lied.

2. There are a number of disturbing lawsuits.

3. It is disturbing that the annual report is very late.

4. There are very few wells that can be traced to Breitling through public records and most have been poor. It is possible to operate an oil company and keep out of public records with regard to wells drilled or to their performance.

5. Going from a few hundred thousand dollars to $65 million in annualized gross income in a few months is remarkable, especially without a source of capital that I understand. Direct investors are not included in the $65 million according to reaper.

There is nothing more. I have discussed other things with reaper, but that is simply an enlightening discussion. Everyone should do their own research.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.