Wednesday, July 01, 2015 9:20:26 AM
But that didn't work very well because the shareholders lawyer served him by publication anyway.
You guys should have known better than to try and issue 10 un named people $144,000,000 in stock and delist Exobox.
The director should be giving the shareholders a medal for blocking a HUGE mistake of a rotten deal. Exobox would have lost 93% of its value obtained in the merger in the first 6 months. Then Exobox would have lost another 75% of the value over the next 60 days.
That is quite a beating we avoided.
And oh yeah the shareholders would have taken that same beating.
And then the "highly profitable" CBG which has never recorded a profit would have been spun out of VICT into an oil company with another 15:1 Reverse Split leaving Exobox shareholders with a little shell destined for sub penny land.
AMFs
ALL IMHO. GLTA
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM