Hi Sidedraft,
I believe you posted same last month. At first I was excited that only 3% of DIMEQ holders failed to tender. However, upon re-reading the draft I discovered that, when the tenders were counted, 3% of tendered DIMEQs examined for submission, were disqualified for technical reasons (unsigned, wrong named filer, etc.).
This, unfortunately, is of no use in trying to determine percentage of total DIMEQs tendered in relation to the amount outstanding. Though, it turns out, those 3% who were rejected may now qualify for a windfall.
Naturally, if someone has a different take on this it would be helpful to the board.
In general, anyone out there who has a question, mis-understanding, a different point of view, or any input to our Board's content that may help all of us better comprehend the issues at hand should feel free to contribute.
