Thursday, June 25, 2015 12:37:36 PM
And if you do, do you think it was alright for them to take the "inside" information they received by using shareholder raised cash and buying assets secretly at 1/7 the cost of what TGC shareholders had to pay to get their share of the similar asset?
Now don't give me the story that TGC didn't have the cash to buy the properties. Just by the fact that Carlo Cevilli put up the $3 million for a 5.1333% interest, AFTER he and his partners bought the 25% for a million less than that amount, should look to any rational individual as a "quid pro quo" for allowing the "sneak peak" at the seismic that allowed them to buy the the 25% in the first place.
If existing management was really looking out for their shareholders, don't you think they should have sold Carlo the 5.1% for the $3 million and then took that money and bought the 25%?
Avant Technologies and Ainnova Tech Form Joint Venture to Advance Early Disease Detection Using Artificial Intelligence • AVAI • Nov 12, 2024 9:00 AM
Swifty Global Announces Launch of Swifty Sports IE, Expanding Sports Betting and Casino Services in the Irish Market • DRCR • Nov 12, 2024 9:00 AM
Oohvie App Update Enhances Women's Health with Telemedicine and Online Scheduling • HLYK • Nov 11, 2024 8:00 AM
SANUWAVE Announces Record Quarterly Revenues: Q3 FY2024 Financial Results • SNWV • Nov 8, 2024 7:07 AM
DBG Pays Off $1.3 Million in Convertible Notes, which Retires All of the Company's Convertible Notes • DBGI • Nov 7, 2024 2:16 PM
SMX and FinGo Enter Into Collaboration Mandate to Develop a Joint 'Physical to Digital' Platform Service • SMX • Nov 7, 2024 8:48 AM