InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,018.39
(
-0.34%
)
US TECH 100
17,010.80
(
0.89%
)
Dow Jones
37,903.29
(
0.23%
)
Brent Oil
84.16
(
0.74%
)
Bitcoin
57,778.78
(
-0.79%
)
Post# of 68822
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

SamuraiAnimated

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 20
Posts 978
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/04/2014

SamuraiAnimated

Re: riskreward007 post# 59589

Wednesday, 06/24/2015 1:06:24 PM

Wednesday, June 24, 2015 1:06:24 PM

Post# of 68822
With all due respect, there are so many things wrong with your main points.

1) Real, established and verified patents (upheld by the courts)
The patents are real because UPTSO issued them, but they are not upheld by the courts.

2) Three patent-infringement lawsuits that they have won
They have not won any patent infringement suit. 3 cases were dropped and settled out of court. CPI, Livewatch, and Alarmforce do not have the authority to validate our patents.

3) Fancy and expensive lawyers.
They could be fancy i suppose, but how much did they cost?
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up