InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 537
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/26/2010

Re: philipmax post# 7577

Wednesday, 06/24/2015 1:29:39 AM

Wednesday, June 24, 2015 1:29:39 AM

Post# of 8307
Additional thoughts to my earlier post.

As we recall, the thrust of the WMHI BK/LTW case was the false,yet upheld, claim that the LTWs were debt holders of WMHI. Under this guise, the Court permitted Arthur Steinberg to negotiate the above mentioned exchange. Since the purpose was, ostensibly, to extinguish a purported debt claim against Washington Mutual Holding Inc., Newco, could not register the tendered LTWs as acquired assets (i.e. claims against the FDIC), as this would not fit into the Court's conclusion. Therefore, I believe that WMIH (I inadvertently misspelled it on the earlier post) cannot possibly claim that it holds any LTW claims to the Award.

Interesting to see their side of the story.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.