Yes, unless you believe extermination and genocide is the goal of the Bush Admin in it's invasion and occupation, a comparison between Bush and Hitler is ridiculous. Bush wants oil, ie "securing American interests". Hitler was a genocidal maniac who's goal was the extermination of the Jewish people and other groups he despised.
If you think there is a reasonable comparison between Bush's invasion and occupation and Hitler's, please explain. There is a reasonable comparison between radical, theopolitical Islam and Nazism, tho. Do you think Bush's goal is to exterminate the Iraqi people - to murder millions of Sunnis, Shias or Christians in Iraq??
Here's an analogy as to intent...
Several years back someone(s) broke into my house and stole "stuff" -- lots of "stuff" like cameras, cell phones and electronics, cash and a ring... They broke into my house and took my "stuff" -- my material possessions. They stole from other's too. They were bad kids. There intention was to steal, but not murder. Their goal in breaking and entering was to steal... For the purpose of example... Charles Manson also broke and entered into people's homes. He also stole. But Manson and Company's primary purpose for breaking and entering was not steal. It was to murder people who's lifestyle, etc, he found offensive. A comparison between my theif and Manson is ridiculous as well...
Bush invaded and occupied to secure oil interests. Hitler invaded and occupied to murder those he found offensive. Yet both Bush and Hilter did invade and occupy... I'm not defending Bush. I am saying there is little reasonable comparison between Bush and Hitler...
BTW, you never explained how someone reading my "forgotten victims" post could conclude I was violent, or nuts, etc. Please explain??...
