InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,460.48
(
-0.41%
)
US TECH 100
19,181.60
(
-0.43%
)
Dow Jones
39,118.86
(
-0.12%
)
Brent Oil
84.85
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
60,864.80
(
0.92%
)
Post# of 104516
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

chessmite

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 33
Posts 3334
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 05/26/2010

chessmite

Re: BigE1960 post# 38863

Monday, 06/22/2015 4:04:06 PM

Monday, June 22, 2015 4:04:06 PM

Post# of 104516
You're relating this observation to QMC how exactly?

Are you saying QDV needs to merge w/nanoco or nanosys in order to survive or be competitive w/QMC?

Are you also implying that the need to be paid is the reason for Nanoco sp drop?

Do you have any information that QMC would need to merge w/one of the above or that they would have an inclination to do so?
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up