InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 941
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/26/2004

Re: sparkasse post# 13747

Wednesday, 06/07/2006 11:58:56 AM

Wednesday, June 07, 2006 11:58:56 AM

Post# of 37776
sparkasse I wrote an e-mail

To James with diferent ideas that he will look at.
I posted this yesterday, not one poster here thanked me for sharing this e-mail with the board and a lot of posters on this board COMPLAIN and FIGHT with one another over B/S when they could do something constructive as writeing the CEO with Real Soulutions.
Get real posters this is your investment.

.
E-Mail I sent and Response back

Let me first say I am impressed with the CEO answering my E-Mail so fast. This shows me he has Character.

My E-Mail Sent
On 6/6/06, WXXXXXXXXXXXX wrote:
Hello James,
> > From the P/R below.
> > http://www.allthatineed.net/pressrelease040206.html
> >
> > I see you do not have a large share structure as
> > other pink sheet
> > Companies have.
> > What would a Reverse Split do besides what it has
> > done today which is
> > cause uncertainty in the market place with IPRE and
> > management..
> > There are a lot of skeptics out there that are
> > wondering if IPRE
> > Management knows what they are doing. I appreciate
> > Honesty in a CEO and
> > management but would also like things explained.
> > Why don't you as management check on other Companies
> > who have done
> > Reverse Splits and see many of them have not worked
> > out to the detriment
> > of shareholders and the Company..
> > I feel a R/S is not needed. I also see that a R/S
> > was done once before
> by management under another Company Name, tell me what did the
previous
> Reverse Split do for the Company and its shareholders that was
positive?
> You have a very good Company with a lot of positives. If you plan on
going
> to another exchange as the OTC.OB do you think at a higher share
price the
> Illegal Naked Shorters will not do the same thing all over again that
you
> are trying to rectify now.
> I do not think so the same thing will happen all over again IMO.
>
> The way to stop this Is to move to the Nasdaq or American Exchange
where
> institutions can get involved with IPRE, also the Nasdaq and American
> Exchange are more scrutinized.
>
> The move to the OTC. OB Exchange means you will be a fully reporting
> Company which is good IMO, but why not if you are going to do a R/S
amd
> spend money on Quarterly Financial Statements apply for the American
or
> Nasdaq Exchange.
>
> Better yet have you thought about a merger with a Company on a higher
> Exchange.
> Case in point JPHC.PK who was massively illegally shorted located in
> Vancouver was bought out by APO Health on the OTC.OB. JPHC saved $
100 to $
> 200, 000.00 in filing fees by doing this. The new Company name is
Paivis
> INC.
> When the new Company Paivis (PAIV) started tradeing Ameritrade
Illegally
> Shorted Restricted Shares and now the SEC is involved.
> This is on the OTC.OB Exchange.
>
> On the OTC.OB IMO you will have the same problems you are trying to
> rectify.
>
> Another way is to find out how many shareholders you have and the
amount of
> shares held by the Company and Shareholders.
> Then you have a good case as to what exactly is going on with IPRE
and the
> markets.
> You can request that all shareholders pull their stock certificates
from the
> Brokerage Houses which means the ShareStructure will be out of the
Shorters
> Hands.
>
> You also could distribute a future Cash Dividend to ShareHolders.
This will
> surely help IMO.
>
> If anything you should explain what your intentions
> > are in detail, not
> > in one sentence as was done in yesterdays PR mentioning
> > the Reverse Split.
> > This was poorly done IMO.
> >
> > I look forward to your response and hope I helped you in some way.
>
> LFWK and USXP are two othe Companies with similar problems. You may
want to
> look at all the Companies I mentioned above and find out what they
are doing
> to counteract the Illegal Naked Shorting in their companies.
>
> >
> > Thankyou,
> > A concerned shareholder.
> > WXXXXXXXXXX
***************************************************************
> >
> >
Response Back
WXXXXXX,

Thank you for your suggestions. Definately some good ones that I will
pass on. I think a lot of your questions were answered in today's PR.

All the best,

James