InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 41
Posts 4235
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/01/2007

Re: None

Saturday, 06/20/2015 10:42:34 AM

Saturday, June 20, 2015 10:42:34 AM

Post# of 403563
I wonder if anyone but myself sees how ludicrous and unconvincing it is to make repeated posts constantly saying the same thing in slightly different language, weeping and wailing about supposed misdeeds by a CEO, when the complainant has no knowledge of what's really gone on or is going on in the corporate offices, demands such knowledge, and yet this is someone who openly admits not having a position in this stock. Why the tremendous investment of time and effort posting the same thing constantly, if there is no personal connection to this stock?

Are we to believe that the constant repetition of complaints is pro bono? I characterize this as "ante bono" -- against the good -- because the NonShareholder's complaint has been overly discussed to the point of nausea, and is so boring in its constant parsing and repetition that it makes people not want to bother reading the board, as they have stated in posts.

Actually, I myself was using a well-known type of expression -- the "rhetorical question." I know perfectly well that many others beside myself see how ludicrous and unconvincing the constant complaining is.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IPIX News