Canopy Growth Corp (WEED)

[Wo]

Re: Extracts
As investors, we can all put ourselves in a thoughtful position where if we were required to vote on a key decision that will affect the corporation, the most responsible decision should prevail. Not negating the venturous spirit, one must always think before a move. With that said, we can look to the Tweed Vice President Mark Zekulin.

"Mr. Zekulin has kept himself busy providing legal, political and strategic advice to high-profile local and international corporate clients, most recently as Counsel at the Ottawa-Washington international trade law firm of Cassidy Levy Kent. Mr. Zekulin is a graduate from the University of Waterloo in Mathematics, the University of Ottawa in Law, and the University of Cambridge in International Law."
http://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/people/person.asp?personId=254215466&ticker=TWMJF

Tweed IMO will approach the question of extracts first with a legal approach, not risking the entire venture on a potential loss of licence. Anything done in this area will be lawful. With that in mind, the "law", or lack thereof being enforced by Health Canada/Ambrose can certainly be challenged by TWD and Perhaps a Class of LP's. Who better to approach such matter than a Vice President with a formidable education in Law? Would investors support the expense of legal action? I certainly would, or do we continue to wait for Canadians to vote in a reform favorable political party. For that I have less hope.