Avid Bioservices Inc (CDMO)

[Protector]

Yes, well apparently you thought wrong and based all kinds of conclusion on that wrong thinking that you then served as fact.

... if I had picked May 29th, yes there were 61 sites open, but based on first patient enrolled 4 months after a site opens, there are still only 4 patients enrolled!!

Yes, but with more then DOUBLE the sites your end result in enrolled patients would have doubled and so would the number of related events. And actually trippled given the JUN totals.

I also made it clear that your additional 21 sites make no difference on the number of events at this time because none of those site's patients could have evented by now!

Stop selling us that nonsense. The 29 sites you did NOT use ALSO enrolled control arm patients, just as all others. And while your table CONVENIENTLY stops in AUG 2014 it hides that 22 of those 29 centres are open AT LEAST 5.5 months now and on average 7.5 months. Oh, let that be a coincidence you used 7.6 months as the control arm SOC. So for you non of the ctrl arm patients in those centres died since AUG.

With what simulation was something wrong did you say?
Here is a simulation that doesn't have all those flaws that yours has.
This one takes into account that all patients do not event at the exact end of your window. That is not realistic. See the details provided of how it is done.