InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 5005
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/14/2009

Re: ccraider post# 21323

Monday, 06/15/2015 12:47:18 PM

Monday, June 15, 2015 12:47:18 PM

Post# of 23258
PTSC is a "non practicing entity" which is the technical name for a patent troll. PTSC makes nothing that use its patents and exists simply to sue productive companies. The
house legislation currently being debated could hurt PTSC.

The recent fact that PTSCs lawyer, Jim Otteson, walked away is also a concern. He seems to be the one who would know the potential of the MMP to collect money in the future and he was due a big % of that.

PTSC might have "won" against HTC but they only won 1/10 of what they were trying to collect. HTC fought the ruling on appeal and dragged it out as long as possible. I worry that Samsung will do the same thing in this case. Large tech companies are emboldened against non practicing entities and have the public and political elite on their side. This is not 2006 anymore and patents have been weakened.

I am just trying to be objective about PTSC as an investment. I feel that when some of the problems get resolved PTSC might be a worthwhile investment. It just seems very risky right now.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CPMV News