Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Zargis]

I need to review th actual ruling documents later because this is ridiculous.

How can judge wheeler rule the government actions are illegal or not allowable, etc. have Greenberg win the case and yet award no damages when that was the whole point of winning.

If Wheeler agrees that government agents acted illegally or even in a coercive manner, then why are shareholders NOT being compensated for their 80% loss?

This is not right at all and CONCERNS ME GREATLY regarding our own trial (s) as some half-win (but really a loss for us) could also occur.

So really, if the government is wrong, and forced the bailout upon AIG / GSEs with 1 - bad interest rates, 2- illegal share purchase rights, 3- no ability for share holders to refute, 4- quickly perform said actions to prevent refuting of the same actions; then again, why should there be no awarded damages???

Even Russia awarded damages in similar situations over the last decade and yet the USA will not?

I admit to a degree this is good for us, but this does not bode well for the illegal share stealing of the companies nor any further gains we take in the progress of our own cases and some such half - victories.

Be well,

-zargis