ScripsAmerica Inc. (SCRCQ)

[coolerheadsprevail]

LOL, so JOSEPH ZAMPETTI, the official homophobe and criminal of SCRC, is now pumping that insider selling by Urbanski is a major catalyst?!? That is really desperate...

Lets see every time urbanski has sold it has been he BOTTOM SEE DEC 12TH WHERE HE SOLD AT .1097 ONLY TO GO TO .2199 60 DAYS LATER!!!!!!!!!! THATS RIGHT UP 100% WHEN URBANSKI SOLD!!!!!

Once again, I suggest folks wander over to the non-fiction side of the library and see the Form 4's that Urbanksi has filed in the past for yourselves:

http://www.secform4.com/insider-trading/1521476.htm

You will see that Urbanski is a serial seller. And if you line up his sell dates against the historical tape, you know what you will find?

Nothing.

There are just as many times that the sp has risen post-sale as there are times that the sp has fallen post-sale, as well as times where the sp has stagnated post-sale.

It's called randomness.

But this is a good time to remind folks of something that I have bought up before re: Urbanksi. As an insider, his shares owned are deducted from the O/S count in arriving at the float. However, the reason for this is that insider and restricted shares are typically held long-term and not "readily available for sale". BUT, in Urbanski's case, he is an active trader, and so all of his shares should most definitely NOT be excluded from the float. Based on his total share ownership combined with his historical trading activity, I would suggest that to be safe, retail shareholders and prospective investors adjust the float upward for anywhere from 10-20% of Urbanski's total shares owned.



As we all should know by now, according to the CORE mantra...

* No news is GOOD news
* Bad news is GOOD news
* Neutral news is GOOD news
* Good news is the BEST news ever

But if you wish to believe the nonsense being spewed by JOEY Z that insider selling should be viewed as a positive catalyst, then please feel free to do so...