Brady- really, why? Why increase the share count? Why not ask for more performance on debt reduction?
Mgt. is setting aside, or claiming to set aside, some 73M shares for DMRJ---I think that shareholders have to step in and make some feelings clear- we don't want DMRJ around that long. Its pretty simple, give them shares and they will take twice as many.
Which brings us to the law suit-- they violated laws regarding how they awarded shares, or at least that is the legal claim.
While I want mgt. to make this company VERY successful, I don't feel they have been straight with investors. They kicked out the guy that built a dying company into a world wide contender, then some of that faction are obviously being rubbed out, further, a broken debt ridden company and they decide to GIVE THEMSELVES CIC payouts? Why not ask us, the owners...
I think too many outrageous things have been foisted on ISC shareholders. And YES, I feel angry about they way they said WE'RE RE-BRANDING THE COMPANY and then gussied up the website and called THAT a re-brand ( at least to date).
I think its time to send a message, a message that says; DO SOMETHING TO BRING VALUE TO THIS COMPANY. AND THEN DO IT AGAIN. THEN, WE CAN DISCUSS GIVING YOU MORE SHARES.
If this is DOING and NOT SAYING, lets go back to just SAYING. I'll take that anyday over what has transpired. You don't succeed and then retreat into a curled up ball and call that DOING.
