InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 173529
Next 10
Followers 33
Posts 2193
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/12/2015

Re: None

Saturday, 06/06/2015 9:45:26 AM

Saturday, June 06, 2015 9:45:26 AM

Post# of 173529
I cannot believe how emotional and unprofessional some of you are being with regards to someone being appointed to the FDA. This is a stock and a financial investment, not a football game. It has zero realistic bearing that AMIC will be approved. All it tells me is the point being made of "If they haven't said no then the chances are greater" are now wrong. It simply means they haven't even looked at it yet and now they will begin to. Furthermore because said individual oversaw a competitors FDA ruling has an honest zero chance to increase the odds of AMIC getting cleared. There is no precedent ruling, if there was it would have already passed the pre market original submission. Let me be clear. I am not saying it won't pass. I am saying the excitement over this guy is unfounded and means literally nothing that he is now on board to bring out a magnifying glass. He very well could and might say they want the polymer radiogel to be tested in tumors before it becomes accepted. Bottom line all it means is they are now beginning to investigate the application and we will know our fate soon.

PS What ever happened to the guy who was bulls^&tting us with the "London Group"
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent RDGL News