InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 44
Posts 4391
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/16/2013

Re: None

Friday, 06/05/2015 9:32:54 AM

Friday, June 05, 2015 9:32:54 AM

Post# of 796065
ORDER On April 23, 2015, plaintiffs in the above-captioned case filed a motion to remove the “Protected Information” designation from defendant’s March 20, 2015 provisional privilege log. Plaintiffs’ motion is fully briefed. On June 2, 2015, the court granted defendant’s unopposed motion to file a sur-response, to allow defendant to clarify its position regarding production of the final privilege logs during jurisdictional discovery. Plaintiffs have now filed a motion to file a sur-reply, stating that while they welcome defendant’s clarification in its sur-response, that submission also makes some new representations. Plaintiffs seek the opportunity to respond, and have attached their sur-reply to the motion. For good cause shown, plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED, and the sur-reply is deemed FILED. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Margaret M. Sweeney MARGARET M. SWEENEY Judge