InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 39
Posts 3596
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/14/2006

Re: HansJ post# 43189

Wednesday, 06/03/2015 7:42:23 AM

Wednesday, June 03, 2015 7:42:23 AM

Post# of 47790
What you don't seem to get is that the only thing of value left was the shell. The same thing of value that our CEO was willing to sell and enrich himself and a couple others with. We shareholders called BS on that and would rather have a company under another set of directors that are willing to bring technology to this shell that benefits ALL SHAREHOLDERS.

Do you remember the day the stock jumped 1000% to .03 on nothing but IHUB pump? Do you understand what that means? It means these share are held tight, these shares have the ability to move with real news back to the pennies if there is a real company behind it. What Jack and Sean proposed was going to only get rid of that little value for shareholders and wipe them out from any chance of seeing pennies again. What others are proposing is bringing this company current, something that all previous CEO's were able to keep until Jack let us default on that, his only real accomplishment!

Even when the filings for the RM scam were released, the rumours and anticipation alone saw the stock moving towards a penny, until the day Sean announced a 2000 for 1 reverse split for existing shareholders, until he couldn't explain how EXBX would still trade without its own CUSIP, that's when the covers were blown on his and Jacks scam.

I don't believe for a second that Sean paid $50K for anything! And that BS will be proven shortly I hope!

Now if the market cap of EXBX was/is less then 100K where the hell do these idiots think it was worth $1 million in damages? That sounds like lawyer BS to me.