Drone Services USA Inc. (DSUS)

[Cassandra]

Peter Villiotis remains the SOLE officer/director of Drone Services USA, Inc. (DSUS - fka PVEC, PVECD, VDSC) per filings with the Nevada Secretary of State. Legally, he is the ONLY one who can make changes to the Articles of Incorporation.

http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=uyx9DfdRU25WJll%252fgaY8sQ%253d%253d&nt7=0

The Florida address and telephone number also remain the same as that used by Peter Villiotis for PVEI (now named DSUSA), PVE (the Florida corporation) and Zeus Travel:

1850 SE 17th Street, Suite 305
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33316
954-716-8796

http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/DSUS/profile

The financial statements being used to maintain "Current Information" status with OTC Markets are for PV Enterprises International, Inc. and signed by Peter. If they do not represent the financial statements of Drone Services USA (DSUSA) then that status is erroneous.

http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=DSUS&id=138949

There is not a single filing with information about a drone company or naming the supposed new officers and directors.

Although the transfer agent, Olde Monmouth Stock Transfer Co,, has been given Joel Bredow's name as the new contact, they have not been given a new or direct telephone number for him and have apparently never spoken with him. OMSTC telephone number: 732-872-2727

Why is Joel Bredow is shown only as "Acting CEO" on the OTC Markets company profile (link above)?

It is my suspicion that despite the name and ticker and ticker symbol change, an actual reverse merger has not been completed.

It would be consistent with Peter Villiotis's extensive and verifiable history with this public company for it to later be claimed that the supposedly "fell through" as happened with ALL of the other mergers, dividend and major contracts he previously announced. He makes announcements of forward-looking events as though they were historical.

What has been portrayed as occurring with this public company now named DSUSA does not make any sense. If the supposedly merged company was as legitimate as people are supposed to believe it, then it would have filed an S-1 registration statement with audited financial statements and required disclosure to go public instead of doing a shady reverse merger with an extremely tainted corporation. The cost for doing so would be far less than "honoring" the 18,627,799 Series C preferred shares at $.20/share, which equals nearly $3.3 million.

Additionally, when a public company/shell does a reverse merger, the vast majority of new shares are issued to the owners of the private company with the former shareholders experiencing massive dilution of their holdings. It does not make sense that a the owners of a private company would do a reverse merger into a public shell without taking majority ownership.

As has always been the case with this company, there are a large number of red flags, many of which I haven't even mentioned. I do not believe this saga will end well for investors.