Wednesday, May 27, 2015 10:50:40 AM
<<ORDER The court invites the Attorney General to present the views of the United States as amicus curiae on the statutory interpretation issues raised in these cases within 45 days of this Order, including the meaning of the statute’s “submission” and “solely” language and also including whether performing a process and retaining process records after initial FDA approval for the purposes of demonstrating compliance with FDA requirements is protected by the safe harbor of § 271(e)(1) if that activity also has a commercial purpose.>>
Will the SG not have to visit the original Hatch Waxman act, its language and its intent, to provide clarity here? The recorded comments by Judge Raider (a minority opinion unfortunately), indicted something to the effect that "I was there" for the construction of the HW act and the intent clearly was not honored by the previous CAFC injunction etc. Will the SG brief be posted and where? Thanks and regards, bp
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM
Avant Technologies to Implement AI-Empowered, Zero Trust Architecture in Its Data Centers • AVAI • Apr 29, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Reports an Over 50 Percent Increase in Sales and Profits in Q1 2024 from Q1 2023 • BANT • Apr 25, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix's Breath Logix Alcohol Device Delivers Positive Impact to Private Monitoring Agency in Montana, USA • BLO • Apr 25, 2024 8:52 AM