InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 237
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/20/2013

Re: None

Tuesday, 05/26/2015 10:04:35 AM

Tuesday, May 26, 2015 10:04:35 AM

Post# of 57006
I think the TC evaluation was a quickie shot in the dark that didn't produce truly definitive data to show true success. What i think was learned was that you just can't slap 1, 4, or 6 AOT units and expect a maximum result. i think much was learned about other factors that contribute or interfere with the desired result. said another way, I think the TC eval. was a badly conceived experiment that produced ambiguous results. no pipeline company is going to spend the money to improve flow until they know exactly the mechanism involved that makes that improvement.
More importantly, they are not going to risk there current performance parameters with a new technology until they are 110% sure they know scientifically what is going on to make the improvement in flow happen.
Saying that they used the wrong power supply may be just a cover-up for a bunch of other things that may have happened that weren't expected or desired.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent QSEP News