Intel Corp (INTC)

[Ixse]

re: AMD's 4x4 is supposed to be their "top secret" answer to Conroe

I must disagree with the idea that it was meant as an answer to Conroe. 4x4 is mostly just a marketing trick to keep up image. It can even be somewhat effective in this. Alienware presented yesterday and it's not that big a step to believe that there's a good chance that they'll build systems based on this. The systems will be reviewed and attracked attention more than money. From AMD's point of view it's a no brainer (efficient use of money for the purpose of marketing). From Intel's point of view though this particular system isn't of that much importance at all (very low rev). I agree that Core 2 Extreme will fit the bill way better for far most gamers. What I disagree with is that this was meant to be AMD's "top secret answer to Conroe", as it is mostly marketing and almost no answer. It might be successful in a rather small niche.

90nm QC will have lower frequency, while most games are still single threaded. I doubt it would have had made much impact in the gaming market. At least 4x4 can be nicely upgraded over time - it's not exactly all bad. QC is relevant for the server market mostly. I agree that 90nm QC has about a zero chance to see the light of day now 65nm is close.

Regards,

Rink