InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 649
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/03/2014

Re: None

Sunday, 05/24/2015 6:49:49 PM

Sunday, May 24, 2015 6:49:49 PM

Post# of 3360
2. AF writes "IsoRay also plays rope-a-dope with the five-year overall survival rate of 100% for Cesium-131 patients. The company fails to mention the comparable five-year survival rate for patients undergoing surgery alone is 98% -- a clinically meaningless difference of two percentage points"

The facts again based on the link of the study results in the PR are " the five year overall survival rate for high risk patients with WR+CS131 was 100% whereas it was 97.7% for low risk patients with WR only"

3. AF write "In their conclusion, the study authors do not endorse IsoRay's Cesium-131".

The facts again based on the link of the study results in the PR are "Study authors state that for high risk WRs, we favor use of Cesium-131 brachytherapy".

Now you know who is lazy with the facts. This guy should be ignored from now on by every investor. Less

by r_taparia @ Yahoo message boards
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CATX News