Buff. I value your opinion and know you won't sugar-coat the response. So, let me pose you this question? Lately, many posters on this board would suggest that the company (Mcgann, Liscouski et al.) doesn't care about retail shareholders....meaning they don't care about the share price. Yet, I struggle to comprehend how or why someone with Mcgann's history, track-record, and resources (as well as can be said for Liscouski)would be putting all their time, energy and considerable credibility into an exercise that would pay them the salaries they are currently receiving. It would certainly seem like they are in this for a big ultimate pay-out? doesn't that mean an end-result where share prices are dramatically higher? and can they get the big pay-off without general share-holders also reaping the benefits?
