Just to keep things straight I was not referring to anything u said in regards to conspiracy or fluff. THOUGH U LAID OUT A FRIENDS AND FAMILY CONSPIRACY IN YOUR REPLY. I was directly referring to a comment UA had made.
As far as "fluff PR" on Indian deal, and Indian deal itself. Let's recap:
1. Deal announced between filbert, Pomo Indians, and CNAB.
2. Deal is legal as far as state of CA is concerned.
3. No "FLUFF" PR was done this became a huge national story as huffington Post, CNBC, and many others picked up on it. Not to mention every California network channel.
4. Appears that the local city/county government were not for it. The sherif spoke out against it
5. We await to see what happens. Maybe dead, maybe not.
But just to clear what I said up, and to avoid it from being manipulated I figured I would reply
