Eyes.... I agree with you that the call was positive and I was, in fact very impressed with Liscouski. I am also a frustrated long who is in the hole by $50,000+ and I have a very hard time with his answer that DMRJ isn't responsible for "all" of the selling. Maybe not "all", but certainly enough so that it is very clearly the root cause of the stock price decline. So, rather than give Bill Clinton-like answers, why not be more forthright in stating he recognizes the debt is a big problem and that he/they are focusing on a capital restructure so that shareholders (past and future) will see an end to the dumping of 8-cent converts at badly-depressed prices like 70 cents a share.? I think we are simply asking BL that (in his words) show that shareholders are more worthy of currying favor with than your toxic lender.