NanoViricides Inc. (NNVC)

[changes_iv]

When posting about Pump Terminator (PT) what is implied or suggested by their actions is that he/she/them are a low-down, lying kind. That is all. He/she/they don't like how the company is managed, and just for the sake of causing damage, PT in his over-inflated sense of self worth believes that great minds can only come from ivy league colleges/universities with Ph.D.s. Titles and acolades help but it was not the case with Tesla. Read more here about (6) uneducated Amateurs whose genius changed the world. http://www.cracked.com/article_19248_6-uneducated-amateurs-whose-genius-changed-world.html

Did Dr. Anil Diwan's discovery and development of nanoviricides begin through serendipity? While testing the nanomicelle as a future therapeutic courier, Diwan and company ran a Proof-of-Concept against a massive virus particle, cytomegalovirus, biggest virus to give the nanomicelle a huge target. After applying the nanomicelles to the culture, they found no virus. Couldn't figure it out because there was not yet an Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient in the micelle...the nanomicelle destroyed virus particles every single time a virus particle came in contact... -BigKahuna. True? Ask Dr. Diwan. Who else would you ask, an anonymous poster that claims his slur, his libelous/defamatory blog, is protected by his/their Freedom of Speech - First Ammendment. The New York U.S. Court of Law at their discretion ruled the blog was protected but based on the results on other cases before U.S. Courts of Law across the U.S. they ruled wrong.

Pump Terminator(PT) was not interested in the truth, legal or otherwise. He/she/they were on a hit job and wanted to cause damage to our property/stock price and he/she/they did. But in the interest of truth, legal or otherwise, the sociopath(s)/psychopath(s) should have come out of the shadows and face his/hers/their victims/the damaged party, NanoViricides, Inc. and stockholders. PT should have stated: Here are my/our claims and here is my proof!

PT was too busy blogging falsehoods, half truths, lies, all from a place in the shadows, all under the cover of Freedom of Speech!?!

Examples of defamation/libel cases:

A judge has rejected a request from the widow of Chris Kyle, the author or “American Sniper,” to order a new trial or set aside a jury’s verdict in favor of former Gov. Jesse Ventura of Minnesota, who was awarded $1.8 million in a defamation claim against Mr. Kyle. Mr. Ventura said Mr. Kyle made up a claim of punching Mr. Ventura at a California bar in 2006 after the former governor supposedly made offensive comments about Navy SEALs. Lawyers for Mr. Kyle’s wife, Taya, argued that the laws and evidence at trial did not support the jury’s award. Judge Richard H. Kyle of Federal District Court, who also presided over that trial, wrote in a decision filed Wednesday that the trial was fair and the verdict supported by “substantial evidence.” Mr. Kyle was considered the deadliest sniper in United States military history. He was killed in Texas last year.

A version of this brief appears in print on November 27, 2014, on page A26 of the New York edition with the headline: Minnesota: Ventura’s Defamation Award Upheld.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/27/us/minnesota-venturas-defamation-award-upheld.html?ref=topics&_r=0

Detroit News Loses Libel Case
By United Press International | September 6, 1985

A former owner of the Pine Knob entertainment complex won a $3 million libel suit against the Detroit News. A jury in Wayne County Circuit Court announced the award Wednesday after two days of deliberations. Gary Francell claimed in his suit that four Detroit News stories falsely linked him and co-owner Joseph Locricchio to organized crime. Although both Francell and Locricchio sued the newspaper, only Francell was awarded damages. Their lawyer, Jeremiah Kenney, said jurors declined...
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1985-09-06/business/8502280312_1_libel-jury-detroit

'Anonymous' Posters to Pay $13 Million for Defamatory Comments
Internet Service Provider Cooperated to Provide Information Leading to Suspected Identity of Topix Commenters
By KI MAE HEUSSNER and SUSANNA KIM

April 24, 2012 —

A Texas couple who filed a defamation lawsuit over three years ago against anonymous posters on the Internet forum Topix.com won a $13.8 million judgment from a jury.

Mark and Rhonda Lesher of Clarksville, Texas, filed a suit against anonymous commenters who accused them of being sexual deviants, molesters, and drug dealers on Topix, once self-described as "the country's largest local forum site."

"This vindicates us. This is vindication for all the scurrilous, vile, defamatory statements that caused us to be indicted, to be tried, that caused us to move out of town and my wife to lose her business," Mark Lesher said, the Texarkana Gazette reported. "You can't post anonymous lies on the Internet without suffering the consequences."
http://abcnews.go.com/Business/jury-awards-13-million-texas-defamation-suit-anonymous/print?id=16194071

PT slurs, defamatory, libelous, criminal blog should not be claimed to be protected by Freedom of Speech - First Ammendment if he/she/they cannot stand in person before a U.S. Court Law to defend their half-truths, falsehoods, claims, right next to the party that was damaged, NanoViricides, Inc./stockholders. It is all about "The Law" and being able to face our accusers before a U.S. Court of Law. We were the damaged party and we were there.

=========================================

16.11

"Apparently," I said to him, "you care nothing for the public, for Malthus, for the truth, for conscience, or for yourself."

16.12

This is the way an opinion gains acceptance in France. Fifty ignoramuses repeat in chorus some absurd libel that has been thought up by an even bigger ignoramus; and, if only it happens to coincide to some slight degree with prevailing attitudes and passions, it becomes a self-evident truth. ~ Frederic Bastiat

http://www.econlib.org/library/Bastiat/basHar16.html