ell, that word is supposed to be "seen". Yeah, but to bad. I come here for a minute or two to put a post and that is it. I am gone. The fact that my post is hard to read doesn't invalidate what I have said. We all know everything about that logical fallacy, don't we? When you cannot attack a statement, wiggle your way around to attack something about the maker of the statement. This is one of the most clear indications about the fallacies in the arguments of a person. So, don't discuss me, discuss the company, which has been around more than twenty years sucking money from people.
Another bad argument that some make is "well that was then and this is now." That's the same argument a person with a bad record makes when they apply for a job. And you know what, they always get turned down for the job because the record counts. There is a concept behind the "three strikes you are out" that is the same as rearranging a failed company again and again. But I know you do not want to hear that. I know you want everybody to believe that it is different this time around, but guess what, the market is telling you that it is not, and the only way investor will know that it is not is when all those with insight into the business (management, their families and friends, their neighbors and acquaintances, the vendor and customers, their families, friends, acquaintances and neighbors. The next door business, et cetera, as a group) realize that the business is about to pop and they buy. In a business as small as this, with as little trading as there is, it wouldn't take much to get it moving. But the fact that it is not trading ten million shares or more every day and that the stock is not climbing tells me clearly that it is all smoke.
