Gold Seeker: I am a big skeptic...just ask those who've been around a while and have even called me a "basher" at times for questioning things and pointing out the negativity. When the latest data sets came out, when everyone was rejoicing, I was complaining bitterly about how the internal studies are meaningless right now.
HOWEVER, if you believe that Moro would outright lie to an inquiring investor (rather than saying "no comment"), you should not be investing in BOCX. Come on man that is as basic as it gets.
Also, re-read headache's post. He did not ask Moro about the colorimetric versus RIA assay. He asked about the personalization, and the key sentence in Headache's post was "reiterating the natural interpretation of the PR that he was discussing a possible improvement of the test when we made the remarks about personalization".
Call the good Dr. yourself if you don't believe Headache.
I have no relationship with Moro but I speak regularly with many others at BOCX and would be too embarassed to ask about this topic since the P.R was as clear as day.
I will agree with you, though, that it was NOT clear whether or not the colorimetric assay had been completed in the P.R that first discussed it. I immediately called my contacts to discuss.
Unfortunately I never share that sort of info but you are free to call for yourself.
DISCLAIMER: NEVER ASSUME INFO ON MESSAGE BOARDS TO BE ACCURATE. ALWAYS DO YOUR OWN DUE DILIGENCE. DON'T BUY STOCK BASED ON THIS POST OR ANY OTHER POST. I OWN A LONG POSITION IN THIS STOCK AND THEREFORE I AM BIASED.
