Well, it's pretty obvious now that the Brazil deal was a total fabrication and ruse. The tell tale was the FINRA document, which no one has ever seen BTW, which was used as a prop to support the existence of a non-existent deal. Why not just publish the details or at least a summary of the deal? I'm sure the contract, if any, was just a dummied up letter of intent, totally unbinding, between NRIB and ass clown Junior Faria in Rio. Like I said, the contract and the FINRA report were just props in a charade which has now played itself out in the form of non-delivery.
Phony documents play a big part in the operation of MRIB. There are many questionable situations surrounding MRIB documentation. There are the attorney letters to OTC attesting to the MRIB submitted information as true and accurate which it wasn't. Why would an attorney take that risk? A common theme in OTC scams if one researches the criminal cases is the use of forged documents from questionable and/or fictional attorneys. Then you have what must be stacks of opinion letters affirming removal of legends from shares. I'd love to see some of those because I can't imagine what would make them exempt from safe harbor. Again, in the past many scams simply used boiler plate opinions, a bottle of white out and a copier. Not saying MRIB did any of this but a lot of it is very questionable and unexplained. Hardly seems kosher. Bottom line is it would seem the vodka, lots of inexpensive paper props and tons of cheap PR made it all possible for MRIB to fool a lot of people...TWICE!
