That is originally what I thought was going on. But the Law360 article stated otherwise (I just looked, couldn't find the link a 2nd time).
I think any deal to buy out XIDEQ was probably squashed by maggots queering the deal by posturing for settlements on losses that never really were sustained by bondholders, tort holders and so forth. But it matters little, now, sadly for those that sustained real losses.
Glad I bailed at 30 cents and moved on. Sorry if my comments bothered anyone, but they were intended to help, not hurt investors that might know less about the company than I did after working there for >2 decades.
GLTA.
