InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 47
Posts 4674
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/23/2003

Re: Commando911 post# 282102

Friday, 05/08/2015 10:57:04 AM

Friday, May 08, 2015 10:57:04 AM

Post# of 312030
My take is that would make no sense at all.

The equipment itself can be manufactured by any competent fab shop to the specified PTOI design. To me, it would make all the sense in the world to have OBG take on that roll.

There is other "off the shelf" ancillary equipment, piping, etc that will need to be supplied as well.

Having OBG integrate, install and operate is a great strategy. As the technology is implemented across the world other similar organizations would most likely take on that roll.

PTOI will simply licenses the use of the technology licenses the technology to EcoNav, or others, supply catalysts, etc. and collects royalties and other revenues. I would love to see John officially back and heading up a PTOI R&D organization someday.

Apple floundered until Steve Jobs took control again. Fortunately I think Heddle is a whole lot smarter than the idiot that ran Apple before Jobs came back.

The catalysts are the key.

(I don't think PTOI will be quite as big is Apple has gotten, but you never know.) :)