![](https://investorshub.advfn.com/uicon/10471.png?cb=1644761464)
Friday, May 08, 2015 8:27:31 AM
And it is obvious that Cotton received a reply from the court ( that he did not share with us) whereas he would not have changed his argument stated in his second letter to the court posted here; http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=109453991
Again, another "response" to the court and request to intercede. That is still not the same as a "claim" filed with the court. All that letter is, is a letter to the court. Note that it has not been entered in with a docket number. I am certain that Cotton has received a reply to that letter by now. It would be nice if he would share the court's response so we can put this behind us. As I said, Cotton has no standing intercede in this court case. Only the trustee for the CTs can do that. If he did, that would be like a shareholder for Microsoft , for example, asking to intercede in a court case that Microsoft was a party too. If Cotton or any other shareholder has a problem with how the Cts are being treated, the only legal means to address an action would be for the Ct shareholder to file suit against the CT's trustee.
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Flotation Cell Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. and Hemp Emu Announce Strategic Partnership to Enhance CBD Product Manufacturing • BLEG • Jun 27, 2024 8:30 AM
POET Wins "Best Optical AI Solution" in 2024 AI Breakthrough Awards Program • POET • Jun 26, 2024 10:09 AM
HealthLynked Promotes Bill Crupi to Chief Operating Officer • HLYK • Jun 26, 2024 8:00 AM