InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 1054
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/03/2005

Re: Kag post# 3956

Monday, 05/29/2006 2:07:48 PM

Monday, May 29, 2006 2:07:48 PM

Post# of 30387
We're back to the same place. While he has childishly repeated the point about 10 times, Kag refuses to explain why personalized baseline levels are required for a general screening test. While a persnoalized test is a nice application, it is not part and parcel with a general screening test. He also refuses to address the fact that every other general screening test on the market has been implemented without personalized baseline levels. Finally, he refuses to address the fact that BOCX has shown us RAW data which shows a universally applicable baseline level of RECAF.

Kag...sell your 150 shares and stop worrying about these ridiculous things. If you want to worry about something:

1) independant validation
2) ability to integrate on Architect
3) getting off the pink sheets








DISCLAIMER: NEVER ASSUME INFO ON MESSAGE BOARDS TO BE ACCURATE. ALWAYS DO YOUR OWN DUE DILIGENCE. DON'T BUY STOCK BASED ON THIS POST OR ANY OTHER POST. I OWN A LONG POSITION IN THIS STOCK AND THEREFORE I AM BIASED.

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.