US Stem Cell Inc (USRM)

[Dragon Lady]

LOL quote, "Have been wondering the same thing but am quite certain the source will be connected to Collins. Seems too targeted not to be."

Funny how it's NEVER anything related to the company itself (BHRT) and the deals they willingly sign with a slew of toxic debt lenders: Asher, Daniel James, KBM Worldwide, MAGNA, Vis Vires, Fourth Man, etc (see ANY of their SEC 10-K or 10-Q filings going back years)???? NEVER a possibility of that or of those traders and their trading desks- always this "collins" thing???

Again, WHAT EXACT LAW, what EXACT SEC or similar statute is being broken when a trade for 666 shares (a buy or a sell order) is placed by some trading desk and routed electronically to fill? Is there an EXACT law that says trade amounts of 666 shares are some violation of law? I'm confused regarding all that?

Apple or Google or NO OTHER STOCK of the 1000's of stock traded daily on the U.S. markets NEVER, EVER have trades for share amounts of 666 shares? EVER? I'd find that hard to believe IMO.

Also, why is a judge going to toss a case supposedly - right off the bat w/o really hearing much about it, when the very debt described in the case filing is shown right "on the books" of BHRT, including the most recent filed 10-K, JUST AS DESCRIBED IN THE LEGAL CASE? Why is BHRT "carrying" that debt to this day on their books if it's supposedly not owed and a "judge" is somehow just going to "toss it out"? Why would a judge do that?



THERE IT IS- EXACTLY as the legal case as filed describes the debt owed Brenda Leonhardt: $1.5 million of "subordinated debt, related party". It's right there plain as day IMO.

Here's the legal filing for the suit- and that's exactly how the debt and it's base, principal original amount is described (plus interest now of course- making the suit amount much higher). Why would this get "tossed" by some judge lickity split- when the debt is shown even on BHRT's own most recent SEC filings? Why? Makes no sense to me? They appear to owe it- so why do they not pay it then? They're paying lots of other people back- including Northstar LLC insider as one example. So why not this other debt? What made it "subordinate" to other debts owed? That's what a judge is going to look at very carefully IMO, from what one can read at face value from the suit as filed. Doesn't look like some slam-dunk "toss it out" IMO?

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20150107006044/en/Investors-Sue-Bioheart-Millions-Unpaid-Debt#.VUbuQo6rSt8

http://lawsuitpressrelease.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Leonhardt-v.-Bioheart.pdf