You've 'discovered' nothing. That implies the DD was hidden. Everyone knows how to look up this info. It's freely accessible. You say you 'provide' and 'discover,' but what you don't provide is WHY you are spending countless hours and thousands of posts and travel money to bash TNOG. And while you're bashing, you're also accumulating and then flipping TNOG into any run. That's verifiable. What chutzpah. Your posts may or may not be outright lies, but you do slant and leave out a lot of stuff.
Example: One of the wells they're redrilling at the Bastrop lease did have oil and gas. You never mention that.
Example: The K1 well had oil and gas. It tapped out, but they did have it. And they may have it still. They may redrill to find the missed target. You never mention this. You'd rather dredge up endless reruns of your well-spun DD...some of it nearly a year old. You ran those same reruns many dozens of times on RB before they booted you.
Example: You say TNOG is not discovering new oil, but merely opening up 'old capped' wells. Spun as a negative when in fact TNOG on its own website says that's what their business is predicated on! It is cheaper to reopen and redrill wells where there was oil than to wildcat (where the chances of finding new oil is much less).
Exmple: You posted over and over how dangerous pinks are and how few pinks ever graduate to other markets. And yet in your profile you say you prefer high-risk stocks. While you are trying to warn newbies to stay away from pinks, your true motive is to keep 'em out of TNOG. Very slippery. Investors are adults and nearly anyone who invests in pinks KNOWS they are volatile and risky. They are responsible for their own decisions and they don't need you treating them as children. (Another old basher ploy--act as a 'wise' old man).
Example: You leave out how your animosity toward TNOG and Maupin may somehow be tied up with your brother in-law who is in the oil business with a different company. He may have a personal grudge against Maupin. As a result, any negative thing about TNOG is ballooned and endlessly repeated by you, but when it comes to revealing your own motives, it's totally 'hush hush.' I guess you're leaving it up to us to 'discover' your true motives. Do you work for the Manitoba Group? Did you lose a ton on a pink sheet stock and decide to 'get even' with TNOG? Working with an MM? Just a crank with an unusual hobby? Tell us the reason behind your feverish obsession with TNOG and your credibility will become far more verifiable.
Example: You use the word 'verifiable' as a catchphrase to cover your tracks and what you're leaving out. And that is TNOG is a viable start up oil company with a lot of potential.
Example: You pretend to be neutral and you don't claim to have a buy or sell recommendation re: TNOG, yet you repeatedly harass longs by calling them 'stuckholders' --whether or not they are stuck (and many of us are NOT stuck!) while never EVER saying a contrary word to the legion of bashers clogging up the RB who are telling outrageous lies about TNOG.
Example: (from the longs board) There's a twist to everything you post, in every fashion possible. Like when you said to use "Maupin" when you're
looking up the railroad reports online. To a newbie, they would look up
history using Mauphin as a keysearch. To someone like me, we know that
Maupin wouldnt turn up the proper results....you have to search with Titan.
Example: You spin the percentages as negative when in fact it's good for TNOG. TNOG has little debt and is NOT diluting. (You never mention that).
Example: You went to the K well when nobody was around. (Actually, you trespassed). Whatever you said regarding a lease holder is hearsay. Whatever you interpreted was completely your own spin. Whatever you see out of a plane over Bastrop should be treated with the same skepticism--and nothing will be verifiable even if you say it is!
JMHO.
AI
