Sunday, May 28, 2006 1:53:40 PM
I would be stunned if someone had a logical explanation as to why they put 18,000 into stock guru instead the RUSH site. I think its truly damaging to the company and stock to have the existing site stay as it is much longer. Yes I know he said he was working on it, that could be 18 months as other things that are in the works seems to take so long.
Internet time is fast fast fast, not months not weeks but seconds, its going to pass RUSH by if they dont get on it and get with the program.
DO IT NOW-
ewaterinfo site is broken and non functional: fix it – cost – 2,000 max.
Enjoytherush site redo it --- 10,000 to 20,000 for a very nice high end site
or
Leave the current enjoytherush site intact just clean up the front end with nice graphics, leave the fatcow shopping cart underneath --- 5,000 to 10,000
Web postioning - Thats another 1,000 min. a month depending on how deep their pockets are.
A program of good web site key word development takes months and constant review to change keywords and phrases as needed to achieve good placement on the search results.
Not saying stockguru is a bad thing, just they are just going push hits old sites. FIX them then strat to push traffic to the sties.
IMO only.
Maybacks Global Entertainment and ZEASN Technology Private Ltd. Sign Global Licensing Agreement • AHRO • Aug 8, 2024 7:00 AM
SANUWAVE Will Host a Conference Call on August 13, 2024 at 8:30 AM (ET) to Present Q2 Financial Results • SNWV • Aug 8, 2024 6:59 AM
Kona Gold Beverage Inc. Signs Letter of Intent with Bemax, Inc. to Sell Kona Gold, LLC • BMXC • Aug 7, 2024 10:00 AM
Btab Ecommerce Group, Inc. Launches Investor Connect AI Chatbot for Enhanced Investor Engagement and Lead Generation • BBTT • Aug 7, 2024 9:00 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Announces Preliminary Unaudited Second Quarter 2024 Financial Results and Provides Business Update • HYDI • Aug 7, 2024 8:52 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Mt. Vernon Gold Mine Startup, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Aug 5, 2024 9:00 AM