InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 120
Posts 1626
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/27/2009

Re: ADVFN_franknstein post# 56984

Friday, 05/01/2015 2:02:56 PM

Friday, May 01, 2015 2:02:56 PM

Post# of 59584
Why now?
Because when the Note holders were made a RIDICULOUS offer to satisfy their debt, the terms were less than satisfying! If Alonzo had the debt holders best interest at stake he would have made the deal when it was 1st being planned out! instead they ramp the buyers stock up and push the other stock down, to favor the purchase! Even our 144 debt ( that Alonzo made Ineligible) was given a 30 day look back over a 1 year period, I would expect nothing less from any substitute offer!


Alonzo filed about that agreement on March 31, 2015
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/top-shelf-ceo-announces-agreement-122800574.html

Over a month neither you nor another note holder mentioned that it was a lie.
Why not during that time?
And why now? What has changed your mind?
The lie seems still the same to me.