InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,180.74
(
1.03%
)
US TECH 100
17,594.40
(
-0.09%
)
Dow Jones
38,852.27
(
0.46%
)
Brent Oil
83.49
(
0.02%
)
Bitcoin
64,191.72
(
1.62%
)
Post# of 60937
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Chicorumba

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 33
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/21/2009

Chicorumba

Re: litton51 post# 60838

Thursday, 04/30/2015 12:40:13 PM

Thursday, April 30, 2015 12:40:13 PM

Post# of 60937
I believe the outcome of the trial was that T-Mobil was not infringing on the Calypso patent based on the terminology as it was defined by the court. Therefore, if the terminology used in the T-Mobil patent for this communication platform is not considered to be encompassed by the Calypso patent terminology, then couldn't another company buy the Calypso patent and deploy the communication platform without infringing on the T-Mobil patent?

I don't want to get anyone's hopes up, but the logic seems reasonable to me. Then again, I'm not a lawyer.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up