Marani Brands Inc. (MRIB)

[Matthew Berg]

A year has passed and as with all MRIB claims, all talk. Just Margrit's attempt to say the true and factual claims about MRIB being a scam should be ignored. There was never any intention of going after anyone or taking any legal action.

And again what action could be considered tortious interference? There's two categories and I fail to see how either applies to any events with respect to MRIB. You have contractual interference and business interference. In either case it involves the direct action of a third party, the tortfeasor, interfering with an agreement between two parties. It can be contractual in which the tortfeasor causes one party to the contract to not perform and then there's the business interference in which the tortfeasor prevents one party from doing business with another. I just can't see an instance of this taking place with respect to MRIB. And given existing MRIB business and contract value there is little to nothing MRIB could make claim to financially in the form of actual damages.