In retrospect I think many big companies get their names used (not without repercussions), but with the manner and intensity and information of those, I'll stay with assumption of legitimacy. Thanks.
They have retired what they initially said and PWC once again has changed their mind NOT EPGL. Thanks.
No luck needed just common sense. Thanks
PianoMan75, the assumption that the agreements with AT&T/ COO/ Intel must be legitimate because none of the 3 have disputed it is not validation.
Amazing how EPGL telling people they are not retiring stock as promised is simply blown off as no biggie just like many other promises made by the company.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.