I hope they are as well!
What you are pointing out however, is their consistently ambiguous method of communication. They provide enough language to allow those who wish to spin it as though they committed to more than they actually have. And they have done this for as long as I've been following them.
The most recent example- the early deliver PR. Okay, I'll accept Ted's take on "early delivery" but they never said "has received" or "will be receiving the first week in May" or a number of other more specific sentences. It's soft, "is taking..." When? We cannot tell from the PR. (There is a long list of QMC communications with similar ambiguity- samples, reactors, exclusivity, etc.) I'll be generous and say it may be a style thing but my take is they are intentionally being shifty and that forces me to ask, "Why?"
Again, I hope they are close to having revenues!
