InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 45
Posts 2138
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/08/2011

Re: ptcgolf post# 6623

Thursday, 04/23/2015 5:44:14 PM

Thursday, April 23, 2015 5:44:14 PM

Post# of 24336
Oh yeah that was the trick....

One has the SAME name as before,

except now if incorporated in another state

the original Nanobeak has no financial responsibility

to the "Nanobeak 1" investors.

YEAH THAT SOUNDS LEGAL and FAIR LMAO.

That's what you're saying, right? I just want to make

sure I'm clear on how this rather nuanced "would the

real Nanobeak please stand up" story actually works.

We're all gathered round, teacher.

If that is the case,

it is surely the kind of thing that would

raise my eyebrows as to the ethical nature

of a company that was supposed to represent

good people who invested in Nasa.


When I hear something like that,

a story of double Nanobeaks and such,

I immediately think I must be in some sort of

scamworld. I mean, if it were my company and I loved it,

and I knew I built on the backs of the original investors

I would try to do right by that. Instead you seem to

suggest an entirely different story that oozes question marks

re ethics and the leadership of the group in general.

I don't see much here that makes sense in any other way,

but lead on, captain.

A good way to pass the time till social security kicks in,

anyway.

SD