InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 37
Posts 7064
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 09/06/2014

Re: guardiangel post# 29210

Thursday, 04/23/2015 8:04:24 AM

Thursday, April 23, 2015 8:04:24 AM

Post# of 30046
There is no reverse merger involving Radient.

Saying that share revocation and the voiding of the Radient coporation were "voluntary" is like saying that bankruptcy is "voluntary" or divorce is "voluntary." They are choices. They are "voluntary" only in the sense that in each case, there is more than one choice.

Regarding share revocation, Radient was given a choice: file the missing financials or revoke share revocation. Radient chose the easier and less expensive action. It would have been FAR better for RXPC shareholders if Radient had chosen to file the missing financials.

Regarding the voiding of the corporation, Radient made a choice: keep paying the fees to keep the corporation in good standing in Delaware, or just abandon the Corporation in Delaware. Radient chose the easier and less expensive action. It would have been FAR better for RXPC shareholders if Radient had kept their corporation status current in Delaware." Doesn't Radient plan to operate in the USA any more?

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.