I Agree. All Good Points and On Topic:..
1)) The TA issue theory can't be disregarded. Dilution is a dirty word nobody wants to consider. Nonetheless its possible. When perceived multiple runs (off big PRs) don't materialize, (or drop) thoughts normally turn to the usual trading suspects, i.e. MMs, Shorts or some other anomaly.
2)) The iseeAutomation deal PR is almost to ridiculous to even consider. Appears same day Technis deal Dies with the same
Price tag and deal structure. A ghost of a supposed big footprint manufacturing entity. Then with the ink barely dry on that deal, and it too Dies? Very suspicious turn of events, even if it was legit..
3)) IMO, The bitcoin market in general is misunderstood as it relates to current BYSD strength, (in it's current form) as compared to bitcoin dynamics and worldwide general acceptance. Most posters, (including myself initially) think/thought this would be automatic riding the coat-tails of bitcoin to stardom. Now I see differently. Going to be more complex than originally thought...
Which brings me back to point 1)) and MMs in general. They seem to be indicating a similar sentiment to "would be investors" perception.. Specifically in terms of comical Petro deal debacles and gagged TA..
BYSD GOT TO CLEAN UP ITS ACT..
The only jolting PR was on the $5 million Technis sale, which resulted in a trip to .003. This $5 milly or something close appears to be the benchmark to measure future performance, including new revs to come.. MM no doubt, want to see far better out of BYSD because BYSD predicated on $4.16m annual rev projections while exposing a failed $5m Technis and Iseeauto Deal. Just a Fact: when you lay those million dollar expectations down and come up short, investors notice.. So Now the bar is raised and BYSD got to find a way to complete deals, (without dilution if it's so) and ungag the TA.. IMHO.
