InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 112680
Next 10
Followers 6
Posts 270
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/23/2014

Re: Perfectson post# 58546

Tuesday, 04/21/2015 3:32:25 PM

Tuesday, April 21, 2015 3:32:25 PM

Post# of 112680
Ok, as far as I know, mCig hasn't broken that law (yet). All they have done is applied for a trademark for a device that, if actually sold, would break that law.

Is the USPTO prevented from approving trademarks for devices that, if sold, have the potential to violate a federal law?

Again, I don't know. It seems obvious that they should not be allowed to approve such a trademark, but I'm betting there are examples of them having so approved such trademarks.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent BTZI News