Followers | 829 |
Posts | 119725 |
Boards Moderated | 17 |
Alias Born | 09/05/2002 |
Sunday, April 19, 2015 6:21:53 PM
With Lovenox, there is variable animal feedstock, and hence you have to verify the batch production output indefinitely. The (purported) need for indefinite submissions to the FDA is what allowed Amphastar to succeed in Appellate Court by claiming non-infringement under the H-W Safe Harbor.
With Copaxone, on the other hand, there is no variable input element, so once you reverse-engineer TEVA’s (now also MNTA’s) production process, you’re done for all time and there is no need for ongoing submissions to the FDA.
Based on the interpretation of the Hatch-Waxman Safe Harbor taken by the CAFC, the above is a consequential distinction, IMO.
“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”
North Bay Resources Reports Assays up to >25% Mg, 0.1% Ni, 0.1% Cu, 0.01% Co, 0.3 ppm Pt at Tulameen Platinum Project, British Columbia • NBRI • May 29, 2024 9:03 AM
One World Products, Inc. Issues Shareholder Update • OWPC • May 29, 2024 8:20 AM
Green Leaf Innovations, Inc. Engages Olayinka Oyebola & Co for Two-Year Audit • GRLF • May 28, 2024 8:30 AM
HealthLynked Introduces AI-Powered Chat Function to Enhance Healthcare Accessibility • HLYK • May 28, 2024 8:00 AM
Avant Technologies Engages Wired4Tech to Evaluate the Performance of Next Generation AI Server Technology • AVAI • May 23, 2024 8:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. Unveils Collaboration with Celebrity Tattoo Artist Kat Tat for New Tattoo Aftercare Product • BLEG • May 22, 2024 8:30 AM