There would be no way for Provista to keep the use of DR-70 secret and still get patents and/or FDA clearance.
Furthermore, Provista could be sued by its shareholders if they were using DR-70 secretly and spending money on DR-70 secretly and not disclosing this in their prospectus and annual reports.
RE: "William" and his patents: If you search for fibrin, fibrinogen, and FDP in the PAIR database and don't find "William's Lung Cancer Test" then "William" has no patents pending for his Lung Cancer Test. "William" said a lto of things in his video and on his website and on the crowdsourcing websites that are unproven and undocumented. Anyone investing in claims by a CEO without seeing the evidence is a fool, IMO.
"Now do a research in India for the CIT...Keep one thing in mind..It is not named CIT, it is a new version of the vaccine that includes Chang's technology.."
1. If it's not called CIT, what is it called?
2. Radient's license to use Chang's newer technology at the Univ of Florida terminated because of lack of payment by Radient. If what you say is true, that would be an easy way to find the secret CIT studies -- who in India has a license to use the Univ. of Florida's technology? (answer: nobody, because there are no CIT Studies in India.)
guardiangel, you also say: "..In a PR that you don't seem to take for credibility, it mentions that it was going to be researched and improved." You are correct, I don't think that PR has credibility. If we have learned ANYTHING about Radient, it is that their PR's do not have credibility, wouldn't you agree?
